Trilogy Search Partners
At a Glance
A strong boutique counterweight to the scale anchors on a cap table; the operating-executive model is the differentiator to probe in the first conversation.
- Pricing
- Custom Pricing, Investment terms, not fees: standard traditional search-fund economics, negotiated per the model's conventions.
- Best For
- Traditional searchers who value operator depth: a smaller, partner-capital firm whose support model centers on experienced executives rather than fund scale
- Track Record
- Founded in 2014; over $240M of committed capital across 90-plus completed transactions and over 80% participation in acquisitions, by its own count. Its home page counts an eleven-person team while its team page lists twelve on the investment side and nine operating executives.
- Lane
- Traditional, Self-Funded
- Funds
- The search phase and the deal
- In the Round
- Says it will either lead or join, depending on the deal.
- Based
- Mercer Island, Washington, and San Francisco.
- Invests
- No mandate sentence anywhere on its site. Its own portfolio holds three Canadian companies and one in the Dominican Republic beside the United States ones, which is the only thing it publishes about where it will go.
- Buys
- Its front page names SaaS, healthcare and healthcare IT, tech-enabled services and B2B services. Its portfolio page adds a belief in traditional B2B services purchases, and says its job is to help find a great business whatever the industry. No size band or earnings floor anywhere on the site.
- Before A First Call
- A placement memorandum, and it supplies the tool to write one: a partnership with Grata gives prospective searchers guided access at no cost while they complete it.
- First-Time Operators
- Five stages of what the firm does for a searcher, from thesis work through the first hundred days, and a line that entrepreneurs may move into entirely new industries during a search. The home page wants leaders with distinctive backgrounds, and one partner's biography describes the people it backs as newly-minted MBAs or mid-career professionals with distinctive experience in finance, consulting or operations, which is a profile rather than a bar. Every case-study buyer came from consulting or the military, and nothing conditions on having run a company.
- How Long The Search Runs
- No length on the search and nothing about what happens if it ends without a deal, on the pages this review read. Ask what the clock is before you sign anything.
- Published Terms
- No check size, stake or fee on the pages this review read. Most firms on this shelf publish none, so ask early rather than late.
- What A Searcher Gets
- Not published on the pages this review read. It is the figure a searcher most wants and most of this shelf does not print it, so ask before the first call rather than after.
- After The Close
- Helps form the board and plan the move into leading the business as a deal approaches its close.
- Roadmap Stages
- 1. Learn & Choose Your Path3. Set Up & Fund the Search
Deals It Has Backed
Purchases this firm's own pages evidence, from the Search Acquisitions Record. Not a portfolio: a deal joins that record only when two independent parties have published enough to verify it, so this is the part of the firm's work that can be checked rather than all of it.
- Message Digital · Garrison Jones · 2026
- ASI Group · Dave Ritchie · 2025
- Wayleadr · Alex Thinath · 2025
- Upper Hand · Brad Wills and Brad Greene · 2025
- Premier World Discovery · Rafa Caldas and Zach Krumholz · 2025
- Crystal Practice Management · Kyle Baer · 2025
- FleetFlo · Dan Calano · 2025
- ExpensePoint · Mohamed Farid · 2024
- Reliable Premium Management · Henrique de Freitas · 2024
- Metabolic Solutions · Adnan Fakhoury · 2024
- Advanced Aircrew Academy · Jordan Huibers and Alvin Wong · 2024
- Growth99 · Rob Pickell · 2024
- Spivey Services · Wade Chipps · 2023
- BroadPeak Partners · Tobin Kearn · 2023
- Meternet · Bryson Smith · 2022
- CITTA Brokerage · Scott Sorenson · 2022
- Cerbo · Courtney Dunn and Jonathan Dunn · 2022
- Central Storage Warehouse · Hill Hamrick and Sam Krieg · 2021
- Ennoble Care · Kush Das · 2021
- Risk Mitigation Consulting · Vince Kuchar · 2021
- Bridge (formerly The Kotter Group) · Winston Smith · 2021
- Meridian Title Corporation · Randy Rempp · 2021
- Icon · Ryan Galea · 2021
- TaskRay · Sam Swan · 2021
- Abound Health Group · Jenna Whigham and Dennis Lally · 2020
- Clariti · Cyrus Symoom and Jake Dancyger · 2020
- Radiation Detection Company · Ryan Turk · 2020
- Crown Health · Nikita Sunilkumar · 2020
- Woven Care · Laura Franklin · 2020
- OneShield · Brandon Parker and Cameron Parker · 2020
- Facilities Survey · Zach Seely · 2020
- Pacific Fertility Center Los Angeles · Brittany Collins and Miles Collins · 2019
- BP Logix · Girish Pashilkar · 2019
- Performio · Grayson Morris and Luke Teeple · 2019
- IntellaTriage · Daniel Reese · 2019
- Automotive Business Solutions · Michael Cox · 2018
- Botanical Designs · Edward McDonnell · 2018
- Ascend Software · Robert Southern · 2018
- Morningside · Roland Lessard and Thomas Klein · 2017
- Castle Tire Recycling · Chandos Mahon · 2017
- Omatic · Dan Kim · 2016
- Fraxion · Ben Litjen · 2016
- FieldEdge · Steve Lau and Rameez Ansari · 2015
- Remarkable Health · Peter Flick · 2015
- ProPoint Solutions · Raj Mahajan · 2015
- ITpipes · Nader Bebawy
- BSU Electronics · Leyla Sudbury
- Sunscape Landscaping · Nick Seger
- Léargas Security · LJ Campbell
- Transifex · Chris Menier
- Greenback Expat Tax Services · Mike Wallace
- Canyonlands Camps · Connor McCarthy and Caroline Matthews
- PrecisionMed · Anthony Runco and Eric Leach
- Sterling Labs · Tim O'Donnell
- Nuqleous · Garrett Levey and Bill Kloza
- Dynamic Growth Dental Support · Ryan Jones
- Extended Care Professional · Adam Aisen
- Ethos Risk Services · Micah Smith
- Falcon Critical Care Transport · Tyler Coats
- Utility Cloud · Dan Calano
- Emporos · Eric Kristensen
- DriveSafe · Tariro Goronga
- AC Energy Systems · Cory Cottfredson
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Nine named operating executives across finance, HR, marketing, technology, recruiting and go-to-market, and partners who take the board seat
- A Searcher Slack community, a quick-start guide and negotiated pricing on common search tools, on its own approach page
- Joins self-funded searchers at the deal as well as backing traditional searches, on its own case studies
Cons
- Traditional search economics apply, as everywhere in the category
- A smaller team than the scale players, with the capacity limits that implies
- Terms and process are not published
What Searchers Say
Regularly listed among the core traditional-search investors, with community mentions emphasizing the operating-executive support and the partners' operating backgrounds. Its footer states that advisory services run through TSP Advisors, LLC, an SEC-registered investment adviser.
How to Approach
Firms do not publish a term sheet you can prepare against, so this is how traditional (investor-backed) search capital comes in, what it weighs, and how to arrive ready.
The Typical Arc
- A first conversation on your background and why search, before any deal.
- A deep dive on your plan: industries, criteria, and how you will source.
- Backing for the search itself, then a fresh underwrite when you bring a live deal.
- A board seat and governance once you close.
What It Weighs
- Whether you will finish a two-year search, not only start one.
- The quality of your thesis and target criteria.
- How you will behave on a cap table over a long hold.
How to Prepare
- Bring a sourcing thesis, not a blank slate. Buyer Profile Builder
- Know which firms lead versus follow, and on what terms. Investors
- Make your operator case on one page. Buyer Profile Builder