How to Find a Business to Buy

The Four Doors

Every deal a searcher sees arrives through one of four doors: a listing on a marketplace, a broker who sends it before it is listed, an owner contacted directly, or a person who introduces the two of you. They are not four versions of the same thing. They differ in how much competition comes with the deal, how long the deal takes to reach you, and how much of your week each one eats, and the difference between a search that closes and one that stalls is usually a decision about which of them to spend Monday on.

The honest version of the answer is that all four work and none of them works for everybody. What follows is what each one costs, and then the part most advice skips: how to find out which is working for you, from your own record rather than from somebody else’s conference talk.

Listings and Brokers

A listed business is the fastest door and the most crowded one. The seller has decided to sell, the financials are assembled, and a broker is paid to get it closed, which removes months of persuading somebody that selling is a thing they might do. The cost is that everyone else can see it too, so you are bidding, and the ones worth bidding on go quickly. Start with the listing marketplaces and the deal aggregators that watch several at once.

The part that is worth more than the listings themselves is the relationship behind them. A broker with a buyer they trust sends the next one before it goes up, and being that buyer is a matter of answering quickly, asking questions that show you read the material, and passing cleanly when you pass. The brokers and M&A advisors shelf is where to start a list, and the outreach templates carry the first email, the check-in, and the pass with feedback, which is the one most buyers never send and the one brokers remember.

Before you spend a week on any listing, run it through the Deal Screener for a keep-digging or walk verdict. Most of the work of finding a business is deciding quickly which ones are not it.

Going Direct to Owners

Contacting owners who have not listed is slower, quieter, and the only door where you are not bidding against anyone. It is also the one where most of the work is wasted on purpose: the majority of owners you write to are not selling this year, and the point of the exercise is to be the person they remember when they are. That makes it a numbers game with a long tail, and it rewards a list built around a specific trade and a specific radius rather than a wide net.

Build the list from the off-market data and outreach tools, size the pond first with where the businesses are, and narrow the trade with Thesis Fit before you write to anybody. An owner can tell within a sentence whether you have thought about their industry or found their address in a database.

Set the expectation honestly: this door is measured in months, and the reply rate is low enough that a handful of letters tells you nothing. That is exactly why it needs to be measured rather than felt, which is the next section.

The Two Nobody Works

Two doors produce a disproportionate number of closed deals and get a fraction of the effort, because neither of them feels like searching.

The first is the people already around a business: accountants, bankers, insurance brokers, lawyers, and trade-association staff, all of whom hear that an owner is thinking about it long before a broker does. They are not hard to reach and almost nobody asks them. Keep them in the Contact Book with the rest, and give them something concrete to remember you by, which is what the one-page buyer profile is for. The accountant and banker introduction is the email itself: the ask is small on purpose, because the answer to “do you know anyone selling” is almost always no and the point is to be remembered when it stops being no.

The second is the trades themselves. A business already owned by a consolidator is not for sale to you, but knowing which trades are being rolled up tells you where the competition for good businesses comes from and what a seller may already have been offered. The firms confirmed buying in each trade are listed with the deals they announced.

Which One Is Working

By month four a searcher is usually running three or four of these at once and has no idea which is producing. The feeling is unreliable here, because a channel that generates a lot of names feels productive whether or not any of those names return a call, and a channel that produced the one deal you are working feels like the answer whether or not it was luck.

Record where every target came from and read it back. The Pipeline Tracker keeps a source on each target and reports, per channel, how many ever left Sourced, which is the bar that matters: a bad channel does not produce deals that fail diligence, it produces names that never reply. It withholds a percentage from any channel with fewer than five targets, because one advance out of three is a coin toss and it reads like a verdict beside a channel with thirty. The same board runs your own funnel forwards at your own rates, so “am I sourcing enough” has an answer that is yours rather than folklore.

What a Week Looks Like

The stage this belongs to sets the rhythm: on-market coverage plus off-market outreach every week, then decline quickly and anchor value to what debt service supports. The Stage 4: Source & Screen Deals carries the full sequence, and the 90-Day Syllabus puts it in order for a first search.

One warning worth having early: the number of deals you need to see is larger than it sounds, and the cost of looking is real. There were 7,532 SBA change-of-ownership loans in FY2025 across the whole country, which is the size of the financed market you are competing inside. Budget the search itself with the Runway Calculator, and keep the diligence you spend on deals that die where you can see the total, because that number decides how many more you can afford to look at.

Related Questions