Anacapa Partners
At a Glance
The investor to prioritize if being understood by someone who has actually searched matters to you; his three searches predate most of the ecosystem.
- Pricing
- Custom Pricing, Investment terms, not fees: standard traditional search-fund economics, negotiated per the model's conventions.
- Best For
- Traditional searchers who want a founder-investor who has personally run searches, with the board patience the model demands
- Track Record
- Founded in 2010 by a three-time searcher who ran funded searches from 1990 to 2005; its portfolio grid carries about a hundred search vehicles it has partnered with, thirty of them still searching, and about a hundred companies, roughly half still held.
- Lane
- Traditional
- Funds
- The search phase and the deal
- Based
- San Mateo, California.
- Invests
- No investing scope on the pages this review read, so ask whether it will look at a search where you are.
- Buys
- Businesses with a history of profitability, currently earning $1.5M to $5M-plus of EBITDA, with predictable recurring revenue, low capital intensity and middle management willing to stay, in fragmented geographic or product markets.
- Before A First Call
- A contact page naming two addresses, one for information and one for submitting an investment opportunity with the company's name and any supporting materials, which is a route for a deal rather than a condition on a searcher. Its background page describes the energy and character a search demands without turning any of it into a requirement. The wider read found an investor login and a published paper library, and no intake route for a searcher on any of it.
- First-Time Operators
- A description of the character a search demands, work ethic, sales skill, a competitive nature, and the line that succeeding in the search only earns the right to prove yourself as an operator. Traits, not history. The five pages added on the later read describe the companies it wants, the people who work there and the papers it publishes, and none of them puts a condition on what a searcher has run before.
- How Long The Search Runs
- No length on the search and nothing about what happens if it ends without a deal, on the pages this review read. Ask what the clock is before you sign anything.
- Published Terms
- No check size, stake or fee on the pages this review read. Most firms on this shelf publish none, so ask early rather than late.
- What A Searcher Gets
- Not published on the pages this review read. It is the figure a searcher most wants and most of this shelf does not print it, so ask before the first call rather than after.
- After The Close
- Describes the first twelve months after a close as immersion in the business, guided closely by the board, and a horizon generally longer than three years.
- Roadmap Stages
- 1. Learn & Choose Your Path3. Set Up & Fund the Search
Deals It Has Backed
Purchases this firm's own pages evidence, from the Search Acquisitions Record. Not a portfolio: a deal joins that record only when two independent parties have published enough to verify it, so this is the part of the firm's work that can be checked rather than all of it.
- Energy Ogre · Taylor Mattingly and John Watson · 2024
- AdComp Systems Group · Murdoch Miller · 2024
- Metabolic Solutions · Adnan Fakhoury · 2024
- Spivey Services · Wade Chipps · 2023
- Big Box Storage · Zack Perry · 2023
- gFour Marketing · Felipe Ros · 2023
- Charter Impact · David Lueck and Adam Kaeli · 2022
- Nexti · Marcelo Gomes and Rogerio Santos · 2022
- Quick Soft · Rodrigo Eddine and Lucas Fiuza · 2022
- Cerbo · Courtney Dunn and Jonathan Dunn · 2022
- maxRTE · Carla Larin · 2021
- DSD Partners · Mark Devooght · 2021
- Meridian Title Corporation · Randy Rempp · 2021
- Woven Care · Laura Franklin · 2020
- Pacific Fertility Center Los Angeles · Brittany Collins and Miles Collins · 2019
- Dooblo · Guy Solomon · 2019
- i4pro · Rafael Araujo · 2019
- Kantola Training Solutions · Scott Mackenzie and Sarah Rowell · 2018
- Infosel · Miguel García Ruiz and Edgar Pérez García · 2018
- Paragon Legal Group · Trista Engel and Jessica Markowitz · 2018
- Automotive Business Solutions · Michael Cox · 2018
- Botanical Designs · Edward McDonnell · 2018
- Record Reproduction Services · Zack Perry · 2018
- Morningside · Roland Lessard and Thomas Klein · 2017
- Richmond Alarm Company · Brian Vanderheyden · 2017
- CCD · Kalil Diaz · 2017
- Castle Tire Recycling · Chandos Mahon · 2017
- MST Services · Josh Glade and Logan Greenspan · 2016
- Omatic · Dan Kim · 2016
- Datum Technologies · Rafael Alfonzo · 2016
- ISI Telemanagement Solutions · Asim Aleem · 2016
- Remarkable Health · Peter Flick · 2015
- Chronus · Seena Mortazavi · 2015
- EZ Shipper Racks · Ned Tomasevic · 2015
- Productive Access · Alex Gelman · 2015
- Krueger-Gilbert Health Physics · Keith Burns and Michael Curry · 2014
- DCI Design Communications · Charbel Zreik · 2014
- PEC Safety · Colby Lane
- United Pet Care · Aaron Oaks
- American Vision Group · Giovanni Barbat and Erick Laseca
- Auronix · Martin Urrutia and Adrián Villasenor
- ProAgro · Anderson Gava
- Falcon Critical Care Transport · Tyler Coats
- NeuroInternational · Noah Riner
- Management One · Nathan Sheth
- Emporos · Eric Kristensen
- NCFDD · Robin Mohapatra
- IS Entrega · Andre Freire and Marcelo Novaes
- Espyr · Rick Taweel
- Grupo ALUS · Pedro Eguren and Isauro Reyna
- LH Training · Lior Zichron
- Eclipse Cash Systems · Chris Biedrzycki
- eCompliance · Adrian Bartha and Josh LeBrun
- American Security Systems · Sean O'Neill
- Midwest Supplies · David Kidd
Pros and Cons
Pros
- The founder's three searches of his own are rare firsthand credibility among investors
- One of the earliest dedicated funds, with a large searcher-backing count for its size
- Says it participates actively on boards for a portion of its companies and supports all of them through their operating life
Cons
- Traditional search economics apply, with the standard equity and governance trade
- Predictable-revenue focus means some theses will be outside its lane
- Terms are not published; the criteria page describes the company it wants, and the only sentence about the searcher is a screening for fit with running a newly acquired business
What Searchers Say
A fixture in search-fund investor roundups with sentiment anchored on the founder's searcher-first history. As across the category, the working relationship with the specific partner defines the experience more than the firm's name does.
How to Approach
Firms do not publish a term sheet you can prepare against, so this is how traditional (investor-backed) search capital comes in, what it weighs, and how to arrive ready.
The Typical Arc
- A first conversation on your background and why search, before any deal.
- A deep dive on your plan: industries, criteria, and how you will source.
- Backing for the search itself, then a fresh underwrite when you bring a live deal.
- A board seat and governance once you close.
What It Weighs
- Whether you will finish a two-year search, not only start one.
- The quality of your thesis and target criteria.
- How you will behave on a cap table over a long hold.
How to Prepare
- Bring a sourcing thesis, not a blank slate. Buyer Profile Builder
- Know which firms lead versus follow, and on what terms. Investors
- Make your operator case on one page. Buyer Profile Builder