Skip to content

Acquisitions Anonymous

At a Glance

The best free way to build deal-screening reps before and during a search. Listen for pattern recognition from credible operators and a real SBA lender, but treat it as education-entertainment, not diligence on any specific deal.

Pricing
Free, Free, and ad-supported. The companion newsletter is free too. Note that the show's own episodes page runs months behind its feed, so read the feed rather than the page before calling it quiet.
Best For
Aspiring and early-stage self-funded searchers who want to build deal-screening pattern recognition passively, learning to read listings, spot sketchy add-backs, and gauge SBA financeability by osmosis. Not for someone who needs a structured curriculum or hands-on help with a specific live deal.
Roadmap Stages
1. Learn & Choose Your Path4. Source & Screen Deals

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Free and prolific: 500+ episodes, twice-weekly cadence, still publishing as of July 2026
  • Breaks down real listings with concrete numbers (SDE, multiples, add-backs) in the $500k–$10M range self-funded searchers actually target
  • Co-host Heather Endresen is an active SBA lender (Viso Business Capital), so deals get a genuine lender's-eye view on financeability
  • Host mix spans operator, e-commerce, and private-equity perspectives, surfacing different red flags on the same deal
  • Free weekly newsletter delivers the listings reviewed, useful as a passive deal-flow sampler

Cons

  • Analysis is based only on public listing teasers, not real financials or CIMs, so conclusions are directional speculation rather than diligence
  • Random deal-a-week format means coverage of your specific industry or thesis is hit-or-miss; there is no structured learning path
  • Hosts and sponsors have commercial stakes in the ETA ecosystem (an SBA lender co-host, Acquisition Lab as sponsor), so recommendations are not fully disinterested
  • Some listeners say the newer shorter-format episodes sacrifice depth versus the older long-form breakdowns (Apple Podcasts review, Aug 2025)

What Searchers Say

Broadly well regarded: 4.8/5 from ~256 ratings on Apple Podcasts as of July 2026, and Searchfunder members list it among the helpful ETA podcasts (searchfunder.com 'ETA podcasts' thread; the specific praise there is several years old). Recent reviews praise improved production quality (Apple review, Jan 2025); the main recurring complaint is that shorter episodes feel less deep-dive than the old format (Apple review, Aug 2025). Recent (past-12-month) discussion on Reddit and X is thin; sentiment comes mostly from podcast-platform reviews rather than active forum threads.

Compared Head-to-Head

More Podcasts & YouTube