Skip to content

JB46 Partners

At a Glance

The clearest fund-size disclosure among the European backers here, and the coverage map makes the first email easy to address.

Pricing
Custom Pricing, Investment terms, not fees. No fee is charged to a searcher; what the firm publishes about its own side is in the row.
Best For
A searcher who wants an institutional backer with a named fund size and a partner assigned to their own geography.
Track Record
Search fund teams counted three ways on three pages, more than a hundred and eighty, more than a hundred and ninety and over a hundred and thirty. A third fund closed at forty million euros, and a fourth vehicle for long-term holds launched in 2026 with three holdings. Its portfolio is forty-seven entries with an acquisition year each from 2018 across fourteen countries, five of them marked exited.
Lane
Traditional
Funds
The search phase and the deal
Based
Madrid, Spain.
Invests
Europe, the United States, Canada, Mexico and Brazil, with a partner assigned to each coverage geography, two of them sitting in the United Kingdom and Portugal.
Buys
Microcap companies, in its own current word, with no size band or earnings floor published.
Before A First Call
No condition. A general email address, a mailing-list form and a limited partner login, and a private platform of playbooks and a resource library that a searcher reaches by invitation only once already backed.
First-Time Operators
Nothing about prior experience as a condition. Its search fund line says it supports first-time chief executives to acquire high quality companies, which invites the first-timer rather than gating them.
How Long The Search Runs
No length on the search and nothing about what happens if it ends without a deal, on the pages this review read. Ask what the clock is before you sign anything.
Published Terms
No check size, stake or fee on the pages this review read. Most firms on this shelf publish none, so ask early rather than late.
What A Searcher Gets
Not published on the pages this review read. It is the figure a searcher most wants and most of this shelf does not print it, so ask before the first call rather than after.
After The Close
Says that in its multi-acquisition vehicles, further purchases go ahead with ongoing board approval.
Roadmap Stages
3. Set Up & Fund the Search

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Publishes the size of its third fund and the month it closed, which few backers do
  • Assigns a coverage geography to each partner on the team page, so a searcher knows who to write to
  • Filters its portfolio by year, country, sector, fund and whether the holding is active or exited

Cons

  • No check size, cap-table share or search unit price published anywhere
  • The count of teams supported is a firm-wide figure with no breakdown by market or year
  • Nothing published about what happens when a search ends without a deal

What Searchers Say

One of the larger dedicated search fund investors in Europe by its own account, with a fund close announced on its own news page. Read whole on its eight pages and three posts: its grid of forty-seven names no operator, and it sits uncredited on twenty-three rows of the acquisitions record here, which now cite it; it runs a private platform of playbooks for the searchers it backs, reached by invitation.

How to Approach

Firms do not publish a term sheet you can prepare against, so this is how traditional (investor-backed) search capital comes in, what it weighs, and how to arrive ready.

The Typical Arc

  1. A first conversation on your background and why search, before any deal.
  2. A deep dive on your plan: industries, criteria, and how you will source.
  3. Backing for the search itself, then a fresh underwrite when you bring a live deal.
  4. A board seat and governance once you close.

What It Weighs

  • Whether you will finish a two-year search, not only start one.
  • The quality of your thesis and target criteria.
  • How you will behave on a cap table over a long hold.

How to Prepare

More Capital & Investors