Skip to content

Legate Partners

At a Glance

The clearest operator-heavy option for a searcher who values having been in the seat over having an office to visit.

Pricing
Custom Pricing, Investment terms, not fees. No fee is charged to a searcher; what the firm publishes about its own side is noted in the row.
Best For
A traditional searcher who wants backers who have sat in the chair, and does not need to know where a firm is registered before talking to it.
Track Record
Sixty-plus searchers backed and thirty-plus companies invested in, by its own count. The return multiples beside those figures are named to individual partners and belong to their own companies.
Lane
Traditional
Funds
The search phase and the deal
Based
No address published anywhere on its site, only an email address.
Invests
No investing scope on the pages this review read, so ask whether it will look at a search where you are.
Buys
Companies with a long history of stable cashflows in growing industries, preferring recurring revenue and work that does not require the searcher to learn highly technical skills.
Before A First Call
An email address and a published calendar of the conferences it will attend, which is an invitation rather than a condition. Nothing a searcher must bring or be.
First-Time Operators
A profile rather than a bar: it says it looks for distinctive intellectual horsepower, grit and a track record of extreme success. Achievement is not experience, and nothing requires having run a company.
How Long The Search Runs
No length on the search and nothing about what happens if it ends without a deal, on the pages this review read. Ask what the clock is before you sign anything.
Published Terms
No check size, stake or fee on the pages this review read. Most firms on this shelf publish none, so ask early rather than late.
What A Searcher Gets
Not published on the pages this review read. It is the figure a searcher most wants and most of this shelf does not print it, so ask before the first call rather than after.
Roadmap Stages
3. Set Up & Fund the Search

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Every partner is a former search fund chief executive, which is rarer among backers than it sounds
  • States plainly that it will meet a searcher at any stage rather than only once a deal exists
  • Says what it looks for in plain terms, including a preference against highly technical businesses

Cons

  • No address of any kind published on any page, only an email address
  • Its strongest numbers are returns attributed to individual partners' own companies rather than to the firm
  • Publishes nothing about check size, stake, the searcher's economics, or how long a search may run

What Searchers Say

Named as a backer on the published rosters of eleven separate searchers, more than any other firm absent from this shelf when that count was taken.

How to Approach

Firms do not publish a term sheet you can prepare against, so this is how traditional (investor-backed) search capital comes in, what it weighs, and how to arrive ready.

The Typical Arc

  1. A first conversation on your background and why search, before any deal.
  2. A deep dive on your plan: industries, criteria, and how you will source.
  3. Backing for the search itself, then a fresh underwrite when you bring a live deal.
  4. A board seat and governance once you close.

What It Weighs

  • Whether you will finish a two-year search, not only start one.
  • The quality of your thesis and target criteria.
  • How you will behave on a cap table over a long hold.

How to Prepare

More Capital & Investors