Skip to content
SearchSphereSource
Sign inSign up

Inzo Technologies vs Rapid Diligence

Side by Side

Inzo Technologies and Rapid Diligence, attribute by attribute
AttributeInzo TechnologiesRapid Diligence
What It IsA managed IT and cybersecurity firm with two services aimed at this reader by name: IT due diligence on a business being bought, and IT support for the same business after close. The diligence half looks at what a small company actually runs on, which is the asset class a buyer inherits without a schedule.A tech-enabled quality-of-earnings firm built for SMB buyers, with published pricing: full QoE from $16.5k, a lighter QoE from $11.2k, a $750 pre-LOI vetting report, a $1,097-per-month search advisory tier, and post-close bookkeeping and fractional-CFO services; the firm cites 250-plus deals reviewed across five years.
CategoryDiligence & Earnings ReviewDiligence & Earnings Review
Pricing ModelCustom PricingOne-Time
What It CostsNothing published. Both the diligence engagement and ongoing managed IT are quoted after a scoping conversation.Published pricing (rapiddiligence.com, July 2026): QoE from $16.5k; QoE Lite from $11.2k; preliminary vetting report $750; search advisory $1,097 per month; bookkeeping from $549 per month; fractional CFO from $1,840 per month. Standard QoE turnaround 3 to 4 weeks with paid expediting.
Best ForA buyer of a business whose systems, licenses and backups nobody has looked atBuyers in the $1M to $20M range who want QoE pricing they can see before a sales call, plus a cheap pre-LOI screen ($750) that can kill a bad deal before diligence money burns
Where It FitsDiligence & Close the Deal, Operate & Grow the BusinessDiligence & Close the Deal
Our VerdictAsk for the diligence scope and the support quote separately: the value is in the first and the recurring cost is in the second.Get its quote alongside Guardian's on any standard deal; the published pricing keeps everyone honest, and the $750 pre-LOI screen is worth it on marginal targets regardless of who does your full QoE.
Pros
  • The same firm can scope the risk before close and carry the remediation after it, which removes a handoff at the point a new owner has least attention to spare
  • Trading since 1989, which is unusually long for a firm serving this market
  • The diligence page is written for a buyer rather than for an IT department, so the output is aimed at a purchase decision
  • Genuinely published pricing across the whole service ladder, rare in QoE
  • The $750 pre-LOI vetting report is a useful screening product most firms do not offer
  • SMB-native: the firm reports a majority of its deals involve SBA 7(a) financing
Cons
  • No published pricing for either service
  • The same firm scoping the risk and selling the remediation is a conflict worth naming out loud before the engagement
  • Its healthcare and voice practices are the larger part of the business, so the acquisition work is a lane rather than the whole firm
  • Volume claims and deal statistics are the firm's own
  • A lighter, tech-enabled process is a fit question for messy books that need forensic depth
  • Post-close services create an incentive to stay in the relationship; evaluate each service on its own

Our take

Choose the systems read when what you are buying runs on software, licenses and backups nobody has inventoried. A managed IT firm reads what the company actually operates on, which is the asset class a buyer inherits with no schedule attached to it, and it is the read a quality of earnings cannot make. Two things to hold in mind: nothing is published on price, so the engagement is quoted after a scoping call, and the same firm scoping the risk sells the remediation, which is worth naming out loud before you start.

Choose the numbers when the deal turns on whether the earnings are real, which is most deals. It publishes what almost nobody does: a full quality of earnings from $16.5k, a lighter one from $11.2k, and a $750 pre-LOI vetting report that can kill a bad deal before diligence money is spent, on a three to four week standard turnaround. The trade is depth: a tech-enabled process is a fit question for messy books that need forensic work, and its post-close services create an incentive to stay in the relationship.