Centurica vs SMB Diligence
Side by Side
| Attribute | Centurica | SMB Diligence |
|---|---|---|
| What It Is | A due-diligence and QoE firm founded in 2013 around online-business acquisitions (SaaS, ecommerce, Amazon, content) that now serves searcher-sized SMB deals broadly, with cheap productized entry points and quote-based full engagements. Its own pages no longer describe it as online-only: it names ecommerce, SaaS, agencies and brick-and-mortar businesses alike, a team of more than thirty, thousands of businesses reviewed since 2013, and deals from $50,000 to $50 million. | Fixed-rate quality-of-earnings and legal due diligence built for small-business buyers, run through a vetted network of M&A lawyers and QoE professionals, with a lighter QoE tier for self-funded searchers who can read their own financials. |
| Category | Diligence & Earnings Review | Diligence & Earnings Review |
| Pricing Model | Custom Pricing | Custom Pricing |
| What It Costs | Full QoE and due-diligence engagements are quote-based (packages sit behind a pricing request). Productized entry points are published on its shop: Quick Deal Review $199, LOI Draft $400, extended pre-LOI M&A advisory $599 (centurica.com, July 2026). Full engagements stay quote-based and are priced on the purchase price and the scope, with most projects running three to four weeks. | Fixed-rate packages it prices 30% to 50% below typical market; a full QoE for a deal above $1.5M runs roughly $5,000 to $15,000, with a lighter QoE Lite tier for self-funders. Turnaround is about one to two weeks. Confirm current packages directly. |
| Best For | Buyers of online and digitally native businesses who want diligence from a firm that lives in that deal type, or anyone who wants a sub-$600 productized second opinion before an LOI | Self-funded searchers on a budget who need both a quality-of-earnings report and legal diligence without Big-Four pricing |
| Where It Fits | Source & Screen Deals, Diligence & Close the Deal | Diligence & Close the Deal |
| Our Verdict | The default QoE shortlist entry when the target is an online business; for Main Street deals, compare it against searcher-focused shops like Guardian. | A budget-friendly, buyer-only option covering both QoE and legal diligence; a strong first quote to compare against Guardian and DueDilio. |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Both rows were read at source: Centurica ↗ and SMB Diligence ↗.
Our take
Choose Centurica when the target is online or digitally native, which is the deal type it was built around and has stayed in since 2013. It also suits a cheap productized second opinion before spending real money, since its shop prices a quick deal review under $200. The full engagement is quote-based, its volume claims are its own, and the site says little about who staffs a job today, so ask who is actually doing yours.
Choose SMB Diligence when you need the financial review and the legal review together and the budget is a self-funded one: it quotes fixed rates it puts well below the market, with a lighter tier for buyers who can read their own numbers. Two things follow from the model. The professional on your deal comes from a network rather than one in-house team, so ask who, and the lighter tier trades depth for price, which is the wrong trade on a messy target.