Skip to content

Stanford Search Fund Study (2026)

At a Glance

Read it to understand traditional-search economics, just know it says nothing about self-funded search.

Pricing
Free, Free (Stanford GSB case E967, published ~July 1, 2026).
Best For
Understanding the traditional path's real economics, and arming investor conversations with hard numbers
Roadmap Stages
1. Learn & Choose Your Path

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • A biennial dataset on the traditional search fund segment, running since the 1990s
  • Fresh: 2026 edition released ~July 1, 2026 with data through year-end 2025
  • Aggregate return figures (33.9% IRR, 4.75x ROIC) carry weight with investors

Cons

  • Covers only 'core' multi-investor funds; it explicitly excludes the self-funded/SBA segment most buyers are in
  • 'Selected observations' format: headline aggregates, not the raw dataset

What Searchers Say

Corroborated within a week of release by CapitalPad, Search Funds News, and others. Note: the 2026 edition supersedes widely-quoted 2024 figures (681 funds, 35.1% IRR); our verification refuted those as current numbers.

More Education & Programs