# Pacific Lake Partners A committed fund backing search entrepreneurs. A committed fund founded in 2009 solely to back search fund entrepreneurs, co-founded by Coley Andrews and Jim Southern. It describes itself as the largest dedicated search investor, with offices in Boston and the Bay Area, more than 200 search funds and 120 operating companies backed across eight funds and $1.58B of committed capital on its own story page, and a long-term hold strategy since 2018 for chief executives who want to keep running their companies. - Category: Capital & Investors - Pricing model: Custom Pricing - Where it fits: Learn & Choose Your Path, Set Up & Fund the Search - Website: https://www.pacificlake.com ## At a Glance The scale anchor of the traditional path: most funded [searchers](https://searchspheresource.com/glossary/searcher) want it on the [cap table](https://searchspheresource.com/glossary/cap-table), and every funded searcher should understand why before deciding whether they do. - Track Record: Founded in 2009 and calls itself the largest search investment firm in the country. 200-plus search funds and 120-plus operating companies backed, across eight funds and $1.58B of committed capital, with a long-term hold strategy it created in 2018 that has partnered with fifteen chief executives by its own count and a team page listing twenty-nine people. - Lane: Traditional - Funds: The search phase and the deal - Based: Boston and the Bay Area. - Invests: No investing scope on the pages this review read, so ask whether it will look at a search where you are. - Buys: By its own primer: EBITDA of at least $2 million with $2 to 4 million the target, EBITDA margins above 15%, 60% or more contractual recurring revenue, low maintenance capital expenditure and industry growth of at least twice GDP. It says it would happily back a great company anywhere but would be surprised to find one in the middle of nowhere. - Before A First Call: A search strategy, industries of interest, screening criteria and proposed terms, which its primer names as the objective things it looks at, beside past experience, motivation, resourcefulness and a willingness to listen. It invests in solo entrepreneurs and partnerships and says it has seen success with both. - First-Time Operators: The opposite of a bar, stated: whatever your background, it takes strength, courage and self-belief. Its search-fund primer answers what it looks for in an entrepreneur with a search strategy, industries of interest, screening criteria and proposed terms on the objective side and past experiences, motivations, resourcefulness and a willingness to listen on the subjective side. Says it invests in solo entrepreneurs and partnerships alike. Nothing conditions any of it on having run a company before. - How Long The Search Runs: No length on the search and nothing about what happens if it ends without a deal, on the pages this review read. Ask what the clock is before you sign anything. - Published Terms: No check size, stake or fee on the pages this review read. Most firms on this shelf publish none, so ask early rather than late. - What A Searcher Gets: Its primer says searcher salaries typically run around $130,000 and chief executive salaries around $200,000, growing with experience, and puts the initial search capital at typically $400,000 to $500,000. On equity it cites only the 2024 Stanford study's average of $5.7m for an exited chief executive; nothing states the share a searcher earns or how it vests. - After The Close: Expects few radical changes in the first year to eighteen months while the new CEO learns the company and the role, then five or more years of leading it. ## What It Costs Investment terms, not fees: standard traditional search-fund economics, negotiated per the model's conventions. ## Best For Traditional searchers who want the scale player: a large institutional partner with hundreds of searchers backed and the portfolio network that comes with it ## Pros and Cons - Pro: Scale: the largest dedicated [search fund](https://searchspheresource.com/glossary/search-fund) investor by most accounts, with institutional fund size reported by trade press - Pro: Full-time team and structured searcher support beyond capital - Pro: A Stanford-rooted history at the center of the traditional model's ecosystem - Con: Traditional search economics apply; the structure trades meaningful equity for the backing - Con: Scale cuts both ways: you are one of many searchers in a large portfolio - Con: Highly selective, and terms are not published; its primer does publish the company it wants, down to an [EBITDA](https://searchspheresource.com/glossary/ebitda) floor, and the salary a searcher can expect ## What Searchers Say Widely treated as the reference investor in traditional search, with trade-press coverage of its funds. Community sentiment emphasizes the network's value while noting that fit depends on wanting a large institutional partner rather than a boutique one. ## Compared With - The biggest network or the most personal bench? (https://searchspheresource.com/resources/compare/pacific-lake-partners-vs-futaleufu-partners.md) - Scale institution or family office on your cap table? (https://searchspheresource.com/resources/compare/pacific-lake-partners-vs-miramar-equity-partners.md) ## Sources - https://www.pacificlake.com/our-story - https://www.buyoutsinsider.com/search-fund-trailblazer-pacific-lake-partners-closes-fund-iv-at-175-mln/ - https://www.pacificlake.com/intro-to-search-funds - https://www.pacificlake.com/operating-companies Also on this site: https://searchspheresource.com/resources/category/capital.md Source: https://searchspheresource.com/resources/pacific-lake-partners Last checked: 2026-09-23 Site index for machines: https://searchspheresource.com/llms.txt