# Inzo Technologies vs Rapid Diligence

Systems or numbers: which diligence does this deal need?

## Choose Inzo Technologies

Choose the systems read when what you are buying runs on software, licenses and backups nobody has inventoried. A managed IT firm reads what the company actually operates on, which is the asset class a buyer inherits with no schedule attached to it, and it is the read a quality of earnings cannot make. Two things to hold in mind. The diligence read is free by its own page, a written risk summary and a 30-day plan built from a questionnaire sent to the target. And the same firm sells the managed support that fixes what it finds, which is worth naming out loud before you start.

## Choose Rapid Diligence

Choose the numbers when the deal turns on whether the earnings are real, which is most deals. It publishes what almost nobody does: a full quality of earnings from $16.5k, a lighter one from $11.2k, and a $750 pre-LOI vetting report that can kill a bad deal before diligence money is spent, on a three to four week standard turnaround. The trade is depth: a tech-enabled process is a fit question for messy books that need forensic work, and its post-close services create an incentive to stay in the relationship.

## Side by side

| | Inzo Technologies | Rapid Diligence |
| --- | --- | --- |
| What It Is | A managed IT and cybersecurity firm with two services aimed at this reader by name: IT due diligence on a business being bought, and IT support for the same business after close. The diligence half looks at what a small company actually runs on, which is the asset class a buyer inherits without a schedule. | A tech-enabled quality-of-earnings firm built for SMB buyers, with published pricing: full QoE from $16.5k, a lighter QoE from $11.2k, a $750 pre-LOI vetting report, a $1,097-per-month search advisory tier, and post-close bookkeeping and fractional-CFO services; the firm cites 250-plus deals reviewed across five years. It now also sells a lender-facing quality of earnings for SBA 7(a) files, and publishes 250 or more deals over five years across 50-plus sectors. |
| Category | Diligence & Earnings Review | Diligence & Earnings Review |
| Pricing Model | Custom Pricing | One-Time |
| What It Costs | Nothing published. Both the diligence engagement and ongoing managed IT are quoted after a scoping conversation. | Published pricing (rapiddiligence.com, July 2026): QoE from $16.5k; QoE Lite from $11.2k; preliminary vetting report $750; search advisory $1,097 per month; bookkeeping from $549 per month; fractional CFO from $1,840 per month. Standard QoE turnaround 3 to 4 weeks with paid expediting. |
| Best For | A buyer of a business whose systems, licenses and backups nobody has looked at | Buyers in the $1M to $20M range who want QoE pricing they can see before a sales call, plus a cheap pre-LOI screen ($750) that can kill a bad deal before diligence money burns |
| Where It Fits | Diligence & Close the Deal, Operate & Grow the Business | Diligence & Close the Deal |
| Our Verdict | Ask for the diligence scope and the support quote separately: the value is in the first and the recurring cost is in the second. | Get its quote alongside Guardian's on any standard deal; the published pricing keeps everyone honest, and the $750 pre-LOI screen is worth it on marginal targets regardless of who does your full QoE. |

Full review of Inzo Technologies: https://searchspheresource.com/resources/inzo-technologies
Full review of Rapid Diligence: https://searchspheresource.com/resources/rapid-diligence

Source: https://searchspheresource.com/resources/compare/inzo-technologies-vs-rapid-diligence
Last checked: 2026-09-07

Site index for machines: https://searchspheresource.com/llms.txt